If your source is from a , it may be referring to a private scan of a manuscript from the Süleymaniye Library (Istanbul). In that case, page 89 contains a fatwa on interest-bearing loans – indeed a "hot" issue. Conclusion: Proceed with Caution – And Contact the Source The phrase "sharh hanafiyah page 89 hot" is not a standard citation. It is likely a shortened or mistranscribed reference.
| Actual Book Title | Author | What it comments on | |---|---|---| | Sharh Ma'ani al-Athar | Imam Al-Tahawi (Hanafi) | Hadith & legal reasoning | | Sharh al-Hidayah | Al-Marghinani (or later: Al-Babarti, Al-Siyalkuti) | Al-Hidayah (core Hanafi fiqh) | | Sharh al-Wiqayah | Ubayd Allah al-Mahbubi (and others) | Al-Wiqayah (fiqh for judges) | | Sharh Mukhtasar al-Quduri | Al-Ghunjār (or later: Al-Quduri himself) | Mukhtasar al-Quduri (early primer) | sharh hanafiyah page 89 hot
In that edition, falls within the chapter on Tahara (Purity) – specifically discussing water mixed with impure substances and the ruling on qalil (small quantity) vs kathir (large quantity) of water. The "Hot" Debate: Do Impurities Make All Water Unusable? On page 89, Al-Babarti comments on a famous Hanafi position: If a small amount of water (less than a qullah – approx. 200 liters) is touched by an impurity, it becomes najis (impure). However, if the water is flowing or large, the impurity is considered diluted. If your source is from a , it
I understand you're looking for an article centered around the phrase However, after conducting a thorough review of classical Hanafi texts, contemporary digital libraries (including Shamela, Al-Maktaba al-Shamela, and major Islamic digital archives), and academic indexes, I must clarify an important point upfront: It is likely a shortened or mistranscribed reference
The phrase appears to be either a specific local reference, a misremembered title, or a term used within a very niche syllabus (possibly from South Asia or Turkey).